Dans le cadre de la Journée de la pragmatique l’ISC présente:
Where do we point the finger? Identifying obstacles to verb learning, and how to overcome them
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey–New Brunswick
Vendredi 27 mars 2015 à 15h
Young children the world over appear to expect that a verb presented in a transitive frame surrounded by nouns maps onto a causative meaning and is best associated with an event involving an agent and a patient. At the same time, however, they struggle when a verb appears in an intransitive frame in which two conjoined nouns occupying the subject position. This contrast in performance between the two syntactic environments has been replicated time and again across labs, and has led some researchers to conclude that the fault lies in children’s underdeveloped syntactic representations or in the heuristics they deploy to assign semantic roles to a verb’s arguments. However, I will present the results of a set of word learning studies demonstrating that not only do adults also flounder when presented with a novel verb in an intransitive frame, but when children are provided with semantic support for the form-meaning mapping in the form of an additional informative lexical item or distributional evidence concerning the intended interpretation of the syntactic frame in the discourse, they fare much better with the intransitive frame. These findings suggest that the problem may not be an immature grammar, but rather a lack of sufficient information to narrow down the hypothesis space. Verb learning thus calls upon children’s syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic knowledge, and when these aspects of the linguistic system work in concert, mapping form to meaning is facilitated.